D. Larson Control Unit

Neutron synthesis and the reciprocal system theory with the aether aspect.
A new approach.

I was looking at a site discussing the Rossi&Focardi E-Cat the other day and got an advice to study more quantum mechanics which surely doesn't give any real answers. I already have my theory regarding the machine. So I decided to get back to my papers and find out about gravitation which in my opinion is the source of the excess energy. That is, where to look for the cosmic clue. I came up with the following.
The cosmic background noise is the manifestation of the energy from the aether which creates gravitation and thus mass in the universe. This happens at all locations through the universe. I would call this manifestation the neutron decay as described in the works of prof. Ruggero Santilli and Don Borghi's experiment (www.i-b-r.org).

Postulate – 1. Mass is wavelike 2. Mass is a manifestation of gravitation.

The atom is empty to approx 99%. If we regard the black materia/black energy as the space in between the proton and the electron shells and thus the origin of the background radiation the following occurs: The radiation is present in every point of the universe. In this case we have to regard electrons as magnetic/mathematical entities.
The cosmic background noice is also the energy keeping the electrons, which in fact are energy levels, away from the proton and thus avoiding annihilation. The energy emitted from the proton starts from a zero point level with additional zero points at every electron shell K,L,M,N....(=energy zero point in equilibrium at He, Ne, Ar,Kr,Xe,Ra). The shells (the atom) grow with scalar expansion by Bott's periodicity in every direction with a quota of 2³=8 regarding to mass and number of protons. This happens when a chemical reaction is present or/and a fusion of protons occur. To keep the equilibrium when growing the energy levels inbetween the complete shells/ zero points have reciprocal values. This approach would also incorporate the quarks as mathematical entities when measured from above the 1 fm level, they are the symmetrical print of their closest neighbour graphene when looking at a projection of the proton/neutron complex. The structure of the nuclei in this case will be in parity with the Poincaré symmetry. This model would also explain the radius of the H being huge compared to other, heavier and more complex forms. H has the far most energy content of all matter, because the building of more complex forms takes more energy=mass from every iteration around the "empty" space.
One question; is there any correlation in the periodical system regarding the reciprocal values to be seen in the values of electronegativity, ionization energies or electronic affinities?
One more obstacle is that the peak frequency of the cosmic radiation is around 300 Ghz and it does not quite suite this theory with the speeds of c when propagating different mediums. This should thus count to 95% of the radiation, and the rest should then have to balance with local speeds to get an average. Maybe the direct cosmic numbers is a bad approach, the gravitation should be looked at with more local methods with higher concentration of protons.
I reckon the neutron as a "window" to this sea of one dimensional pure energy.
In my opinion when a neutron is created, it transforms to a proton and emits a scalar wave (electrons) to create or extend the shell. The angular momentum of the rotation around the origin of the radiation creates gravitation. On the other hand a proton can be annihilated together with its electron which is the opposite reaction. In this case the neutron still lives up to 10-15 minutes under certain conditions. (Don Borghi's experiment).
When a chemical reaction or any reaction occurs the status quo reaction will be the golden ratios 1,667 – 0,667 = 1 above the 1 fm level. This occurs when the rotation does not give any change through the neutron synthesis.
An active reaction results in a growth or loss of gravitation = mass and the according exchange of energy.
There are many different names suggesting and pointing at this monopolar dimension MPD of condensed matter as Minkowski flat space, Higg's ocean, or other names as predicted and described by Dirac, Laplace and others. Our 3d Euclidian spherical dimensions are rotating around this MPD and the model supports the multidimensional world proposed by string theory. This is also the universe of motion, composed by space and time, as predicted by Dewey Larson and his reciprocal theory. Dewey Larson refers to MPD as the Control Unit.
The human perception keeps us unaware of the rotation.
Appreciating comments and hints to proceed, this model is so far an intuitive approach. I am just calculating on how to invoke the Mandelbrot set in the model.

B Peret's picture

The cosmic background noise is the manifestation of the energy from the aether which creates gravitation and thus mass in the universe.

Larson, in Universe of Motion, identifies the cosmic background radiation as the radiation emission from Cosmic stars (stars that exist in the Cosmic sector, where time has coordinates and space acts as a clock). The Cosmic sector is often misunderstood as aether because it possesses similar properties that are the inverse of space (temporal, force-based, appears solid rather than a vacuum, particles are interpreted as waves, etc). It does provide an influx of matter into the material sector that can aggregate from gravity to form mass.

If we regard the black materia/black energy as the space in between the proton and the electron shells

Dark matter/energy is just a misidentification in the progression of the natural reference system (unit speed) in the Reciprocal System.

Also, the RS atom does not have protons nor electron shells. It is composed solely of compound motion. See: The Case Against the Nuclear Atom by Dewey Larson.

Dewey Larson refers to MPD as the Control Unit.

Larson's control unit, from Beyond Space and Time, exists outside time and space. Your description sounds more like chaotic strange attractors, which would be cosmic in nature and not metaphysical.

The human perception keeps us unaware of the rotation.

That is certainly true; human perception is very limited, which is why we have so many tools to increase the range of perception. But still, we can only observe and measure absolute locations in space--not in  time--so half of the Universe remains hidden, though we can see the effects that time has on space as "forces."

Appreciating comments and hints to proceed

Might want to read Larson's books, The Case Against the Nuclear Atom and Beyond Newton: An explanation of gravitation. They are available online in the RS library or can be purchased from the store (see links at top right of page). They will give you a different way of looking at things.

"Big mouths usually come attached to small minds." --Burt Gummer