It would have to be a CHARGED cosmic neutrino; an uncharged neutrino has zero net displacement and will pass through any space or time displacement, making them impossible to detect by any conventional method. Same reason the c-neutrino captured by the proton to produce the compound neutron must also be charged--if it wasn't, it would depart the pairing in 1 natural unit of time, being carried off by the progression of the natural reference system.
An analysis of the neutrino FTL situation, including why it must be a c-neutrino and a simple equation that predicts (and exactly matches) the observed speed was posted to the RS2 forum, back in September:
Where c = 1 (the speed of light in the RS). The RS calculation would be the same; I just treat the photon rotation and electric rotation as separate quantities, rather than composite them in to the 1-dimensional inter-regional ratio 128(1+1/9). I think the reasoning is clearer with separate terms. (See the original post for details.)
PS: The proper acronym for the Reciprocal System is "RS." The preposition "of" qualifies it to BE a "physical theory"; "of physical theory" is not part of the proper name and is not capitalized. Larson seldom uses "Reciprocal System" in his writings, preferring to call it his "new theoretical development." Use of the Reciprocal System name did not start until around 1965, appearing in his book New Light on Space and Time (p. 6).
The cosmic background noise is the manifestation of the energy from the aether which creates gravitation and thus mass in the universe.
Larson, in Universe of Motion, identifies the cosmic background radiation as the radiation emission from Cosmic stars (stars that exist in the Cosmic sector, where time has coordinates and space acts as a clock). The Cosmic sector is often misunderstood as aether because it possesses similar properties that are the inverse of space (temporal, force-based, appears solid rather than a vacuum, particles are interpreted as waves, etc). It does provide an influx of matter into the material sector that can aggregate from gravity to form mass.
If we regard the black materia/black energy as the space in between the proton and the electron shells
Dark matter/energy is just a misidentification in the progression of the natural reference system (unit speed) in the Reciprocal System.
Also, the RS atom does not have protons nor electron shells. It is composed solely of compound motion. See: The Case Against the Nuclear Atom by Dewey Larson.
Dewey Larson refers to MPD as the Control Unit.
Larson's control unit, from Beyond Space and Time, exists outside time and space. Your description sounds more like chaotic strange attractors, which would be cosmic in nature and not metaphysical.
The human perception keeps us unaware of the rotation.
That is certainly true; human perception is very limited, which is why we have so many tools to increase the range of perception. But still, we can only observe and measure absolute locations in space--not in time--so half of the Universe remains hidden, though we can see the effects that time has on space as "forces."
Appreciating comments and hints to proceed
Might want to read Larson's books, The Case Against the Nuclear Atom and Beyond Newton: An explanation of gravitation. They are available online in the RS library or can be purchased from the store (see links at top right of page). They will give you a different way of looking at things.
Being an accountant, all the aspects of Larson's work are not within the scope of my professional activities. However, being a human being, all aspects are utterly valuable and interesting for me. Understanding the world is a fundamental desire of everyone in the world and the function of science should be to help everybody understand. A science which only a few people claim to comprehend is useless to society and is a means of convincing the majority of mankind that their capabilities are inferior and therefore it is justified to treat them as slaves.
If it were possible, I would mark as most important for me: physics/chemistry/astronomy/cosmology - those sections that claim to be "exact" sciences and make us believe that they "know" how things work.
I am bussiness professional after my MBA. But medical side always attract me. After my mcts i can research. Any way very interesting and informative post it is.
That's why I put "primary" in the subject line, since there does not seem to be a way to allow multiple selections in a poll. Just too many options to do a permutation of them!
It would have to be a CHARGED cosmic neutrino; an uncharged neutrino has zero net displacement and will pass through any space or time displacement, making them impossible to detect by any conventional method. Same reason the c-neutrino captured by the proton to produce the compound neutron must also be charged--if it wasn't, it would depart the pairing in 1 natural unit of time, being carried off by the progression of the natural reference system.
An analysis of the neutrino FTL situation, including why it must be a c-neutrino and a simple equation that predicts (and exactly matches) the observed speed was posted to the RS2 forum, back in September:
http://forum.rs2theory.org/forum/ftl-neutrinos
Where c = 1 (the speed of light in the RS). The RS calculation would be the same; I just treat the photon rotation and electric rotation as separate quantities, rather than composite them in to the 1-dimensional inter-regional ratio 128(1+1/9). I think the reasoning is clearer with separate terms. (See the original post for details.)
PS: The proper acronym for the Reciprocal System is "RS." The preposition "of" qualifies it to BE a "physical theory"; "of physical theory" is not part of the proper name and is not capitalized. Larson seldom uses "Reciprocal System" in his writings, preferring to call it his "new theoretical development." Use of the Reciprocal System name did not start until around 1965, appearing in his book New Light on Space and Time (p. 6).
The cosmic background noise is the manifestation of the energy from the aether which creates gravitation and thus mass in the universe.
Larson, in Universe of Motion, identifies the cosmic background radiation as the radiation emission from Cosmic stars (stars that exist in the Cosmic sector, where time has coordinates and space acts as a clock). The Cosmic sector is often misunderstood as aether because it possesses similar properties that are the inverse of space (temporal, force-based, appears solid rather than a vacuum, particles are interpreted as waves, etc). It does provide an influx of matter into the material sector that can aggregate from gravity to form mass.
Dark matter/energy is just a misidentification in the progression of the natural reference system (unit speed) in the Reciprocal System.
Also, the RS atom does not have protons nor electron shells. It is composed solely of compound motion. See: The Case Against the Nuclear Atom by Dewey Larson.
Larson's control unit, from Beyond Space and Time, exists outside time and space. Your description sounds more like chaotic strange attractors, which would be cosmic in nature and not metaphysical.
That is certainly true; human perception is very limited, which is why we have so many tools to increase the range of perception. But still, we can only observe and measure absolute locations in space--not in time--so half of the Universe remains hidden, though we can see the effects that time has on space as "forces."
Might want to read Larson's books, The Case Against the Nuclear Atom and Beyond Newton: An explanation of gravitation. They are available online in the RS library or can be purchased from the store (see links at top right of page). They will give you a different way of looking at things.
Being an accountant, all the aspects of Larson's work are not within the scope of my professional activities. However, being a human being, all aspects are utterly valuable and interesting for me. Understanding the world is a fundamental desire of everyone in the world and the function of science should be to help everybody understand. A science which only a few people claim to comprehend is useless to society and is a means of convincing the majority of mankind that their capabilities are inferior and therefore it is justified to treat them as slaves.
If it were possible, I would mark as most important for me: physics/chemistry/astronomy/cosmology - those sections that claim to be "exact" sciences and make us believe that they "know" how things work.
I am bussiness professional after my MBA. But medical side always attract me. After my mcts i can research. Any way very interesting and informative post it is.
That's why I put "primary" in the subject line, since there does not seem to be a way to allow multiple selections in a poll. Just too many options to do a permutation of them!