Bruce wrote at http://forum.rs2theory.org/comment/2185#comment-2185
After you calculate the expansion due to progression and the inward motion of the rotating systems involved, you check the distance between every pair of locations to see if it is zero. For example, if you have 2 locations that are 1 unit apart. Progression will double it to 2 units. If each rotating system at those locations has a net, inward motion of 1 unit, that is 2 units inward. 2 out + 2 in = 0 = concurrent.
"Distance" in what reference system?
Since these collisions/superpositions are the ones responsible for creating the material or cosmic reference systems, they cannot establish references for themselves yet - there seems to be a chicken vs. egg conundrum here.
In other words, in what reference system are these collisions (motion superpositions) evaluated?
That reference system should be universaly applicable to all motion collisions/superpositions (even cosmic motions) because at this stage it is not even astablished whether the observer's motion is material or cosmic. The orientation of the crossratio does not define a distance...
I was mulling this question for months before asking you so please take it seriously.
Is it possible for two motions to be concurrent in one reference sytem but not in another?
Yes, I would agree. When the absolute location of a photon becomes coincident with the absolute location of a proton, then depending on the motions involved, it can either: aggregate (remain stuck in the time region of the proton--a charged neutrino does this to make hydrogen), compound (add motion to existing motion, like vibration on rotation to get rotational vibration) or combine (add to the magnitude of an aspect).
What would the code be to detect such collisions in your simulation ?
IF .... THEN ?
British physicist Dr Mike McCulloch of Plymouth University has presented predicted results on a new theory of inertia that match the order of magnitude of thrust on all experiments done so far on the controversial electromagnetic space propulsion technology EmDrive.
McCulloch's research involves violating Einstein's Equivalence principle by stating that there is a new acceleration extracted from the zero-point field by horizons, and that if inertia were to be quantised at small accelerations, this would explain the anomalous thrust produced by the EmDrive
EmDrive: Nasa Eagleworks' paper has finally passed peer review, says scientist in the know
thanks for your papers which I'm reading with great interest. The RS2-105 seems to be missing from the above list, though I've found it on the website with the title "Quantum-PI". Did you leave it out on purpose?
P.S.: the papers did raise some questions which I'll ask you when I'm finished reading all the tutorials.