Hi Alexis; welcome to the RS2 fora!
Also to be noted that Tesla's extra coil is not coupled magnetically to its excitation source, and from tesla's own word is the best way to acheive tremendous power multiplication. I think of it as an electric whip, where most of the magnification occur in the last few turns.
The whip is an interesting analogy, because the "crack" comes from the end of the whip breaking the sound barrier. An electron whip would make an electron break the lightspeed barrier, moving electric motion into a second, scalar dimension.
Regarding "coupling," its more a matter of terminology. In the RS, magnetic, dielectric and EM fields are all "shadows" of motion, not real "things." What Larson refers to as "electric" and "magnetic" is just the number of dimensions involved in the coupling, 1 or 2, respectively. Dielectric lines are radial and hence, 1-dimensional. Magnetic lines are circumferential, and interact 2-dimensionally. Radiant energy, as defined by the post I just made on an Improved Atomic Model, is 2-dimensional and would be termed in the RS as "magnetic," even though it is more c-magnetism (cosmic magnetism).
-the 2D magnetic and the 1D dielectric directly create a 3D gravitationnal wave
There are no "gravitational waves" in the RS, since gravity is just a linear, inward scalar motion in 3 dimensions. The closest you could get to a "gravity wave" would be the isotopic mass added by captured neutrinos in the atom. Since they are charged there is a wave function to them, which is why they only add 1/2 unit to the mass.
-the magnetically induced current and the dielectric induced current combine in another form of electrons with differents propagation characteristics
That is probably what is going on; an interaction inducing motion in a 2nd scalar dimension of the electron.
-the scalars dimmensions being all occupied a motion component pass into the time domaine and give a temporal wave propagating thru the time structure (or spacial?).
All field effects are temporal, from our material sector point of observation. If anywhere, it would probably be in equivalent space (rather than extension space, the space we measure).
All would seems to result in a strange dielectric-like form of energy transmission reminescent of tesla's radiant energy.
I do some benchwork and can confirm the two differents currents/potentials, preliminary observations show blue/white sparks from the power grid to ground and green sparks between both ends of the power grid, but this may not mean more than different magnitude, not necessarely a different quality. My HV suppy is unstable and unfortunately i spend more time on the hv supply than on the device itself. One can wonder if the two induced currents have exactly the same characteristics or if they are different.
I would have to see a diagram of your setup, before I could comment on the effects being produced.
Are there any other measurable effects, other than a green flash?
During my attempt to create an artificial reality based on RS2, I ended up simplifying the "rotation" logic by using quaternions--not only for a 3D rotation, but for 1D and 2D as well, as I then only needed the single function library to perform quaternion math. As a result of that, I ended up simplifying the electric rotation of particles and atoms.
Larson's particle looks like this (atoms are 2 of these "double rotating systems"):
I've included the dimensionality of each of the a, b and c aspects, because while typesetting one of the Nehru-Larson dialogs, Nehru posed a question as to the number of dimensions involved with magnetic rotation. I had assumed the same thing that Nehru did--that BOTH a and b were 2-dimensional, magnetic rotations. But Larson's answer indicated a different structure: The "a" displacement, the "principle rotation" was indeed a 2-dimensional rotation, but the "b" "subordinate rotation" only had a single dimension, because it shared one of the rotational axes with the "a" dimension, so you only needed one more variable to express it. What you end up with is "a x a" orthogonal to "a x b" for the magnetic rotations, making the ellipsoid "double-rotating system" in 3-dimensional time. (Larson's "dimensions" aren't mathematical ones, they are just the number of scalar magnitudes needed to express a concept.) Larson's electric rotation is just this magnetic ellipsoid spinning in space.
Using Larson's structure, I had to handle electric rotation differently than magnetic rotation, since they do not behave the same--needed a quaternion for the 3d temporal rotation, and a complex quantity for the 1d, spatial rotation. Then I discovered that I could just put in a "conjugate" quaternion for the 1D electric rotation and just grab the imaginary part from it to use it to spin the time region, electrically, as Larson describes in SPU. This structure made handling electric and magnetic functions IDENTICAL--the only difference was that magnetic was time region (imaginary) and electric was space region (real).
I ended up with this structure:
This is a very interesting structure as it is perfectly symmetric, where electricity and magnetism are conjugates of each other (inside-out, explaining the electric-radial and magnetic-circumferential lines of force). So I've concluded that rotation just has aspects of electric (space) and magnetic (time), BOTH are 3-dimensional and work exactly the same. However, since we only see the net motion across the unit boundary, the effect APPEARS 1-dimensional from observation, even though there is 3-dimensional rotation behind it.
As to the consequences of this model, look to the basic relationships of the quaternion:
From this structure, the "free energy" devices can be understood. Tesla's radiant energy is 2D electric motion (space region), generating a coelectric effect where like charges attract and opposites repel--his "brush" effect and monopolar electric transmission. Antigravity effects show up with 3D electric motion negating the gravitational influence of atomic rotation, causing effects that move opposite to the "pull of gravity," since it is now a "push of gravity." I believe this structure gives a good start in understanding--and putting into safe practice--these free energy techniques.Forums: