The other night I was in bed looking out the window at a bright star that was twinkling in the night sky. Then I noticed something odd... it had a sequence, bright, bright, bright, dim, bright, dim, then sort of random after that. The three bright flashes caught my eye. As I lay there, I saw it happen again, that same sequence. Several minutes later, it did it again. For some reason, it reminded me of one of those mirrored disco balls--and I got thinking.
What if... the stars aren't far, far away, but close, close nearby, and are nothing but asteroids reflecting sunlight, like a disco ball reflecting a spotlight? If the asteroid was irregularly shaped (as most asteroids are), a slow rotation would make it twinkle in the night sky, similar to the way several rotating satellites "blink" as they move in orbit. Because of the rotation and odd shape, the light reflected along our line of sight would vary in intensity--but would repeat as a long pattern, at least for a while (until the Earth's orbit moved to a different reflected ray). The planets, being spherical, would not do this, but reflect a constant magnitude of light our way.
I may run an experiment this winter, if I can get a clock drive for my telescope. I'll just point it at an identifiable, twinkling star and stick a photocell on the eyepiece and run it into my computer to record the light magnitude over time. Then look to see if there is a pattern. Brought up graphically, it should be fairly easy to identify a regular series.Forums:
could this pattern apply to universes also?
The CMB comes from the Cosmic sector (3D time), so that is about the only "parallel" universe in the RS theory. The Material and Cosmic sectors, being overlapped and out-of-phase, tend to bump into each other in many places, giving that series of circular patterns.
could this pattern apply to universes also?
the picture caught my attentionEvidence Mounts For A Real-Life Multiverse
Posted by Chris Savia at 04:13, 04 Nov 2015
Hi all especially Bruce and Nehru,
I recently came across this site and although based on classical physics, this authors conclusions I think are valuable in, for lack of a better term, 'lay-ifying', as to say make simpler to understand some of the aspects of RS in terms of the observed universe.
Well, at least I found it did for me.
Am i right?
Yes. Larson only considered a linear progression, basically everything flying apart at the speed of light. It wasn't until Prof. Nehru came up with the idea of angular velocity also being primary that we can also have an "angular progression," which appears as a unit speed rotation (spinning at the speed of light).
Of course, unit speed is the equivalent of nothing; so a displacement will produce something. (If you've ever read the Ra Material, Ra mentions that the "first distortion" is that of free will--opposing the unity.)
Free money driven by e=mc^2 einsteins equation.
If the bank gives individual a 50,000 units of currency they make the e=mc^2 units of the currency. I read in a book some people here may consider offensive that e=mc^2 is energy matter equivalence. Since the constancy of speed of light is (300,000)^2 the bank b will make 50,000 multiplied by (300,000)^2 units of currency.
I know this is a selfish question. But at 32 even after going to a good english language school and completeting two years B.Com in india and part Bsc.(hons) I on am currently net worth zero and havent earned even one usd before this.
I was reading on arstechnica.com that google Inc does that kind of thing and gi ves it away for free but is still sittting on a cash horde of 250billion.ing
I was hoping someone credit for would be able to take the inital thing distill it and cut out the logic errors of it and put itxpecting in a paper.
I am currently not expecting any credit for it.
This should allow a lot of people - i'm not certain how much energy it would take to live on 50,000 units of usd or their local currrency a month.
Thanks for reading so far and appreciate any help that may be provided.
PS: I was hoping to beable to apply it to paypal. I'm not certain how long it would take big saving/commercial banks to get it. Usually if they give you anything its a loan and they will break my back to get it back. If it were verfied anyone would be able to have at least 50,000 units of their currency. I've seen the bitcoin and altcoin seen and it doesnt help since it require ASIC's.
PS2: There are a lot of logic errors in what I said if it could be cut out and I think you guys use PTC MathCAD it would be great. I come from a unreal engine and autodesk maya background and for the life of me I couldnt generate a paper. Thanks a lot :)Forums: