Feed aggregator

still no answer to my original question

RS2 Fora Comments - Thu, 04/21/2016 - 07:19

How does soemthign move in the Cosmic sector in 3d time? In fact how does anythign move in tiem vs. space? Is it because there is NOTHING of substance [matter? atoms?] to move? is the Cosmic sector really ubiquitous energy or waves?

Categories: RS2 Research

Lone planetary-mass object found in family of stars

Astronomy Magazine - Thu, 04/21/2016 - 04:00
Scientists have identified a free-floating planetary-mass object within a young star family, called the TW Hydrae association.
Categories: Astronomy

I only store locations in

RS2 Fora Comments - Wed, 04/20/2016 - 16:05

I only store locations in extension space. (1,0,0) and (1000,0,0) consume the same amount of memory, 3 integers.

That's what I thought and that's why I wrote:  the space that makes up 2 protons really exists, but the space that makes up separation between them does not exist and the distance in the extension space is an intangible vacuum, not a "thing," and objects have nothing between them.

Can we state the same thing about intervals of time? (temporal distances) ?

Categories: RS2 Research

Distance is irrelevant

RS2 Fora Comments - Wed, 04/20/2016 - 13:04

Does your program use more memory to simulate 2 protons that are 1 mile apart, versus, 2 protons that are 1 inch apart (in the extension space) ? 
In other words, does the "nothing between them" consume any resources in your simulation...

No. I only store locations in extension space. (1,0,0) and (1000,0,0) consume the same amount of memory, 3 integers.

Categories: RS2 Research

Carbon nanotubes light up on photonic chips

Physics World - Wed, 04/20/2016 - 09:36
Nanotube-integrated waveguide could easily be adapted into optical circuits of the future
Categories: Conventional Science

NASA missions measure solar flare from 2 spots in space

Astronomy Magazine - Wed, 04/20/2016 - 04:00
Scientists want to pin down the processes that create solar flares and even some day predict them before our communications can be interrupted.
Categories: Astronomy

I'm not sure I understand the

RS2 Fora Comments - Tue, 04/19/2016 - 19:02

I'm not sure I understand the question. Distance (spatial and temporal) between locations is calculated from the net motion between any two locations, normalized to the clock. The rotational content of each location determines the net inward motion in space and time.

I understand. 
Does your program use more memory to simulate 2 protons that are 1 mile apart, versus, 2 protons that are 1 inch apart (in the extension space) ? 
In other words, does the "nothing between them" consume any resources in your simulation...
 

Categories: RS2 Research

Theorizing about the LHC's 750 GeV bump

Physics World - Tue, 04/19/2016 - 09:57
Four new papers try to explain a tantalizing excess of photon pairs
Categories: Conventional Science

Storage requirements

RS2 Fora Comments - Tue, 04/19/2016 - 08:22

@jpkira: space is an intangible vacuum, not a "thing," so to be technically correct, "objects have nothing between them."

Is the storage requirement of your computer model dependent on the separation distance in extension space between two protons?

I'm not sure I understand the question. Distance (spatial and temporal) between locations is calculated from the net motion between any two locations, normalized to the clock. The rotational content of each location determines the net inward motion in space and time.

For each step of the progression, I do calculate and store extension space (and time) geometry to produce something that can be graphically rendered.

Categories: RS2 Research

ESA Finds a Frigid Surprise Hiding at Venus' Poles

Astronomy Magazine - Tue, 04/19/2016 - 04:00

Venus may be boiling hot, but its poles are very, very cold.

Categories: Astronomy

That makes no practical sense

RS2 Fora Comments - Mon, 04/18/2016 - 18:07

That makes no practical sense whatever. Objects have space between them.

But how do you know that space is really there, without light or other motion traveling the distance?
Alas, you cannot feel empty space!

@Bruce
Is the storage requirement of your computer model dependent on the separation distance in extension space between two protons?
 

Categories: RS2 Research

space between doe not exist?

RS2 Fora Comments - Mon, 04/18/2016 - 15:30

That makes no practical sense whatever. Objects have space between them. No theory can change that. Time is how we post changes and mark before and after. no theory can change that. Sure the result is they at different spatial points but that tells me nothing about what make our universe real [or exist at all!]- motion!

Categories: RS2 Research

'Cool' Saharan ants' silver hairs cause total internal reflection

Physics World - Mon, 04/18/2016 - 09:50
Desert-dwelling ant can survive temperatures of more than 50 °C because body hairs reflect light and stop them from overheating
Categories: Conventional Science

Comets in the “X”-treme

Astronomy Magazine - Mon, 04/18/2016 - 04:00
Scientists have determined that comets produce X-ray emission when particles in the solar wind strike the atmosphere of the comet.
Categories: Astronomy

Saturn spacecraft samples interstellar dust

Astronomy Magazine - Mon, 04/18/2016 - 04:00
NASA’s Cassini spacecraft has detected the faint but distinct signature of dust coming from beyond our solar system.
Categories: Astronomy

musical scale and solar system

RS2 Fora - Sun, 04/17/2016 - 13:21

Correspondence of musical notes and the planets of the solar system.

AttachmentSize escala solar.pdf45.67 KB Forums:
Categories: RS2 Research

that's easy to say but hard

RS2 Fora Comments - Sat, 04/16/2016 - 16:40

odd - never thought of looking at this that way - converting time to length. But using this to describe time is the same as saying duration doesn't describe how the object changed its location. If an object moves to a new position in 3d space and takes 1 second to do so we can't just say it took so many meters to do so because that tells nothing about how fast or slow it moved got there or is continuing to move. What am i missing?

What if the empty space, that you are accustomed to thinking as separation between objects, does not really exist?

In other words:  The space that makes up 2 protons really exists, but the space that makes up separation between them does not ...and if their spatial separation were increased, then the amount of computer storage needed to represent such system of two protons, would not increase proportionally to the spatial distance between them.

You can draw the same conclusions about time and the amount of motion needed to represent two separated protons ...or two anti-protons.

Categories: RS2 Research

time

RS2 Fora Comments - Sat, 04/16/2016 - 09:44

odd - never thought of looking at this that way - converting time to length. But using this to describe time is the same as saying duration doesn't describe how the object changed its location. If an object moves to a new position in 3d space and takes 1 second to do so we can't just say it took so many meters to do so because that tells nothing about how fast or slow it moved got there or is continuing to move. What am i missing?

Categories: RS2 Research

Measuring time

RS2 Fora Comments - Fri, 04/15/2016 - 17:00

it would mena clock space is "not moving" but instead is constantly "aging"?  and moving in time means i travel in past - present - and future but just "moving"?  and how do i do that in 3 dimensions?

I believe you are confusing time with causality. They are not the same in the RS.

Causality is past, present, future, which is an ordered sequence.

Time, like space, is just a magnitude. Space = distance, Time = duration. You can say that object is 6 meters long, or that even lasted 6 seconds. "6" is the magnitude.

Because the RS has a datum of unity, one is convertable to the other by the speed of light.

I can take a piece of paper and draw a line that is "1 second" long--and it may take a while, as that line will be 299,792,458 meters in length, because conventional units equate 299,792,458 meters to 1 second.

I can create a cube that is 1 second "long" on each side, and it will be a very big cube, but it's volume would only be 1 cubic second.

It is easier to understand in natural units, since the speed of light is 1/1. So 1 natural unit of time = 1 natural unit of space. If I draw a line that is 1 natural unit of space in length, it is also 1 natural unit of time in duration.

So if you want to get the temporal dimensions, just divide your spatial measurements by the speed of light. Then you will have an object described in seconds, not meters, in 3D time.

Categories: RS2 Research

time measurer

RS2 Fora Comments - Fri, 04/15/2016 - 06:02

that's easy to say [?] but hard to imagine moving aroung in 3d time vs. 3d space.  it would mena clock space is "not moving" but instead is constantly "aging"?  and moving in time means i travel in past - present - and future but just "moving"?  and how do i do that in 3 dimensions?

Categories: RS2 Research

Pages

Subscribe to The Reciprocal System of physical theory aggregator

Donate