Feed aggregator

Could pulsars explain the positron excess?

Physics World - Tue, 04/15/2014 - 09:54
AMS-02 dataset accounted for without dark-matter contribution
Categories: Conventional Science

Beauty from chaos on Mars

Astronomy Magazine - Tue, 04/15/2014 - 04:00
Streamlined islands and narrow gorges were carved by fast-flowing water pounding through a small plateau region near the southeastern margin of the vast Vallis Marineris canyon system.
Categories: Astronomy

Smallest speed jump of pulsar caused by billions of superfluid vortices

Astronomy Magazine - Mon, 04/14/2014 - 19:30
This result is important to our understanding of the behavior of matter under extreme conditions.
Categories: Astronomy

Plasmonic waveguide stops light in its tracks

Physics World - Mon, 04/14/2014 - 08:24
Design could help build 'stopped-light laser'
Categories: Conventional Science

Hubble stretches stellar tape measure 10 times farther into space

Astronomy Magazine - Mon, 04/14/2014 - 04:00
The new capability allows astronomers to use even more distant stars as yardsticks to refine distance measurements.
Categories: Astronomy

Espectro electromagnetico...?

RS2 Fora - Sun, 04/13/2014 - 10:43
AttachmentSize espectro electromagnetico.pdf48.65 KB Forums:
Categories: RS2 Research

Exoplanets

RS2 Fora Comments - Sun, 04/13/2014 - 09:56

One of the things that has bothered me about exoplanets (planets around other "stars") was the orbital periods. When you look at the data, these planets are flying around these giant suns at very high velocities; most having periods of just a few days--hundreds of times faster than our own solar system.

Then it hit me about that comment that Katirai made concerning the "stars" being planets... my own research (published in the daniel papers) indicates that there is historical evidence of the outer planets of our own solar system have gone nova in the past, leaving behind moons and planetary rings, post-explosion. This behavior is analogous to a supernova, but on a smaller scale, with the same effects (supernova generate rings and debris fields). They behave very much like the "stars" we see in the sky.

Then it hit me--what if these "stars with planetary systems" are actually "planets with moons?" So I "did the math," as they say, and took a look at our own solar system, namely Jupiter, since the four, large moons are visible with binoculars on a clear night (well, back when we actually had chemtrail-free skies).

Jupiter's moons have these rotational periods:

  • Io: 1.77 days
  • Europa: 3.55 days
  • Ganymede: 7.15 days
  • Callisto: 16.7 days

Then I grabbed an exoplanetary system, Kepler 101 was the first in the table I pulled up:

  • 101 b: 3.49 days
  • 101 c: 6.03 days

Curious, almost an exact match to 2 of Jupiter's moon periods, Europa = 101b, Ganymede = 101c. I'll bet when they find 101a, it will have a period around that of Io, 1.7 days or so.

But wait... it gets better. What about Kepler's Law, relating orbital velocity and distance? Let's try that out, too, but remembering that we're looking at the system through the "fisheye lens" of the gravitational limit and it is being magnified. So we need to scale down a bit, first. Based on using Jupiter as a reference in our own solar system, our sun is 9.95x larger than Jupiter, so if Kepler-101 is actually a Jupiter-sized planet, the values will be approximately 10x too large.

Orbital radius, semi-major axis:

  • 101 b: 0.045 au / 10 = 0.0045 au
  • 101 c: 0.0648 au / 10 = 0.00648 au.

Now, see how they compare to Europa and Ganymede:

  • Europa: 671034km = 0.0045 au
  • Ganymede: 1070412km = 0.00716 au

Scaling down the sizes from a star to a Jupiter-size planet gives a nearly exact correspondence between Kepler-101/Jupiter, and 101b/Europa and 101c/Ganymede.

Now, what makes more sense... planets orbiting at Warp 4 around a giant sun, or moons orbiting a gas giant planet at the everyday, orbital velocities and distances that we see in our own solar system?

Seems these exoplanets are actually exomoons, with exactly the same orbital relationships we find in our own solar system.

"My God - It's full of stars!"

"My God - It's full of planets!"

 

Categories: RS2 Research

Tabla de elementos quimicos materiales&cosmicos

RS2 Fora Comments - Sat, 04/12/2014 - 17:47

Tabla  de elementos quimicos materiales&cosmicos

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

       

(Th)

(4)-(4)-(4)

(Pa)

4-4-5

(U)

(4)-(4)-(6)

(Np)

(4)-(4)-(7)

(Pu)

(4)-(4)-(8)

(Am)

(4)-(4)-(9)

(Cm)

(4)-(4)-(10)

(Bk)

(4)-(4)-(11)

(Cf)

(4)-(4)-(12)

(Es)

(4)-(4)-(13)

(Fm)

(4)-(4)-(14)

(Md)

(4)-(4)-(15)

(No)

(4)-(4)-(16)

(Lr)

(5)-(4)-15

       

(Ce)

(4)-(3)-(4)

(Pr)

(4)-(3)-(5)

(Nd)

(4)-(3)-(6)

(Pm)

(4)-(3)-7

(Sm)

(4)-(3)-8

(Eu)

(4)-(3)-9

(Gd)

(4)-(3)-10

(Tb)

(4)-(3)-11

(Dy)

(4)-(3)-12

(Ho)

(4)-(3)-13

(Er)

(4)-(3)-14

(Tm)

(4)-(3)-15

(Yb)

(4)-(3)-16

(Lu)

(4)-(4)-15

(Fr)

(4)-(4)-(1)

(Ra)

(4)-(4)-(2)

(Ac)

(4)-(4)-(3)

(Ku)

(5)-(4)-13

(Ha)

(5)-(4)-14

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Cs)

(4)-(3)-(1)

(Ba)

(4)-(3)-(2)

(La)

(4)-(3)-(3)

(Hf)

(4)-(4)-14

(Ta)

(4)-(4)-13

(W)

(4)-(4)-12

(Re)

(4)-(4)-11

(Os)

(4)-(4)-10

(Ir)

(4)-(4)-9

(Pt)

(4)-(4)-8

(Au)

(4)-(4)-7

(Hg)

(4)-(4)-6

(Tl)

(4)-(4)-5

(Pb)

(4)-(4)-4

(Bi)

4-(4)-3

(Po)

(4)-(4)-2

(At)

(4)-(4)-1

(Rn)

(4)-(4)-0

(Rb)

(3)-(3)-(1)

(Sr)

(3)-(3)-(2)

(Y)

(3)-(3)-(3)

(Zr)

(3)-(3)-(4)

(Nb)

(3)-(3)-(5)

(Mo)

(3)-(3)-(6)

(Tc)

(3)-(3)-(7)

(Ru)

(3)-(3)-(8)

(Rh)

(3)-(3)-(9)

(Pd)

(4)-(3)-8

(Ag)

(4)-(3)-7

(Cd)

(4)-(3)-6

(In)

(4)-(3)-5

(Sn)

(4)-(3)-4

(Sb)

(4)-(3)-3

(Te)

(4)-(3)-2

(I)

(4)-(3)-1

(Xe)

(4)-(3)-0

(K)

(3)-(2)-(1)

(Ca)

(3)-(2)-(2)

(Sr)

(3)-(2)-(3)

(Ti)

(3)-(2)-(4)

(V)

(3)(2)-(5)

 (Cr)

(3)-(2)-(6)

(Mn)

(3)-(2)-(7)

(Fe)

(3)-(2)-(8)

(Co)

(3)-(2)-(9)

(Ni)

(3)-(3)-8

(Cu)

(3)-(3)-7

(Zn)

(3)-(3)-6

(Ga)

(3)-(3)-5

(Ge)

(3)-(3)-4

(As)

(3)-(3)-3

(Se)

(3)-(3)-2

(Br)

(3)-(3)-1

(Kr)

(3)-(3)-0

 (Na)

(2)-(2)-(1)

(Mg)

(2)-(2)-(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Al)

(2)-(2)-(3)

(Si)

(2)-(2)-(4)

(P)

(3)-(2)-3

(S)

(3)-(2)-2

(Cl)

(3)-(2)-1

(Ar)

(3)-(2)-0

(Li )

(2)-(1)-(1)

(Be)

(2)-(1)-(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(B)

(2)-(1)-(3)

(C)

(2)-(1)-(4)

(N)

(2)-(2)-3

(O)

(2)-(2)-2

(F)

(2)-(2)-1

(Ne)

(2)-(2)-0

(H)

(2)-(1)-1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(He)

(2)-(1)-0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

H

2-1-(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

He

2-1-0

Li

2-1-1

Be

2-1-2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

B

2-1-3

C

2-1-4

N

2-2-(3)

O

2-2-(2)

F

2-2-(1)

Ne

2-2-0

 Na

2-2-1

Mg

2-2-2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Al

2-2-3

Si

2-2-4

P

3-2-(3)

S

3-2-(2)

Cl

3-2-(1)

Ar

3-2-0

K

3-2-1

Ca

3-2-2

Sr

3-2-3

Ti

3-2-4

V

3-2-5

 Cr

3-2-6

Mn

3-2-7

Fe

3-2-8

Co

3-2-9

Ni

3-3-(8)

Cu

3-3-(7)

Zn

3-3-(6)

Ga

3-3-(5)

Ge

3-3-(4)

As

3-3-(3)

Se

3-3-(2)

Br

3-3-(1)

Kr

3-3-0

Rb

3-3-1

Sr

3-3-2

Y

3-3-3

Zr

3-3-4

Nb

3-3-5

Mo

3-3-6

Tc

3-3-7

Ru

3-3-8

Rh

3-3-9

Pd

4-3-(8)

Ag

4-3-(7)

Cd

4-3-(6)

In

4-3-(5)

Sn

4-3-(4)

Sb

4-3-(3)

Te

4-3-(2)

I

4-3-(1)

Xe

4-3-0

Cs

4-3-1

Ba

4-3-2

La

4-3-3

Hf

4-4-(14)

Ta

4-4-(13)

W

4-4-(12)

Re

4-4-(11)

Os

4-4-(10)

Ir

4-4-(9)

Pt

4-4-(8)

Au

4-4-(7)

Hg

4-4-(6)

Tl

4-4-(5)

Pb

4-4-(4)

Bi

4-4-(3)

Po

4-4-(2)

At

4-4(1)

Rn

4-4-0

Fr

4-4-1

Ra

4-4-2

Ac

4-4-3

Ku

5-4-(13)

Ha

5-4-(14)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

       

Ce

4-3-4

Pr

4-3-5

Nd

4-3-6

Pm

4-3-(7)

Sm

4-3-(8)

Eu

4-3-(9)

Gd

4-3-(10)

Tb

4-3-(11)

Dy

4-3-(12)

Ho

4-3-(13)

Er

4-3-(14)

Tm

4-3-(15)

Yb

4-3-(16)

Lu

4-4-(15)

       

Th

4-4-4

Pa

4-4-5

U

4-4-6

Np

4-4-7

Pu

4-4-8

Am

4-4-9

Cm

4-4-10

Bk

4-4-11

Cf

4-4-12

Es

4-4-13

Fm

4-4-14

Md

4-4-15

No

4-4-16

Lr

5-4-(15)

 

Categories: RS2 Research

Tabla de elementos quimicos materiales&cosmicos

RS2 Fora Comments - Sat, 04/12/2014 - 17:47

Tabla  de elementos quimicos materiales&cosmicos

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

       

(Th)

(4)-(4)-(4)

(Pa)

4-4-5

(U)

(4)-(4)-(6)

(Np)

(4)-(4)-(7)

(Pu)

(4)-(4)-(8)

(Am)

(4)-(4)-(9)

(Cm)

(4)-(4)-(10)

(Bk)

(4)-(4)-(11)

(Cf)

(4)-(4)-(12)

(Es)

(4)-(4)-(13)

(Fm)

(4)-(4)-(14)

(Md)

(4)-(4)-(15)

(No)

(4)-(4)-(16)

(Lr)

(5)-(4)-15

       

(Ce)

(4)-(3)-(4)

(Pr)

(4)-(3)-(5)

(Nd)

(4)-(3)-(6)

(Pm)

(4)-(3)-7

(Sm)

(4)-(3)-8

(Eu)

(4)-(3)-9

(Gd)

(4)-(3)-10

(Tb)

(4)-(3)-11

(Dy)

(4)-(3)-12

(Ho)

(4)-(3)-13

(Er)

(4)-(3)-14

(Tm)

(4)-(3)-15

(Yb)

(4)-(3)-16

(Lu)

(4)-(4)-15

(Fr)

(4)-(4)-(1)

(Ra)

(4)-(4)-(2)

(Ac)

(4)-(4)-(3)

(Ku)

(5)-(4)-13

(Ha)

(5)-(4)-14

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Cs)

(4)-(3)-(1)

(Ba)

(4)-(3)-(2)

(La)

(4)-(3)-(3)

(Hf)

(4)-(4)-14

(Ta)

(4)-(4)-13

(W)

(4)-(4)-12

(Re)

(4)-(4)-11

(Os)

(4)-(4)-10

(Ir)

(4)-(4)-9

(Pt)

(4)-(4)-8

(Au)

(4)-(4)-7

(Hg)

(4)-(4)-6

(Tl)

(4)-(4)-5

(Pb)

(4)-(4)-4

(Bi)

4-(4)-3

(Po)

(4)-(4)-2

(At)

(4)-(4)-1

(Rn)

(4)-(4)-0

(Rb)

(3)-(3)-(1)

(Sr)

(3)-(3)-(2)

(Y)

(3)-(3)-(3)

(Zr)

(3)-(3)-(4)

(Nb)

(3)-(3)-(5)

(Mo)

(3)-(3)-(6)

(Tc)

(3)-(3)-(7)

(Ru)

(3)-(3)-(8)

(Rh)

(3)-(3)-(9)

(Pd)

(4)-(3)-8

(Ag)

(4)-(3)-7

(Cd)

(4)-(3)-6

(In)

(4)-(3)-5

(Sn)

(4)-(3)-4

(Sb)

(4)-(3)-3

(Te)

(4)-(3)-2

(I)

(4)-(3)-1

(Xe)

(4)-(3)-0

(K)

(3)-(2)-(1)

(Ca)

(3)-(2)-(2)

(Sr)

(3)-(2)-(3)

(Ti)

(3)-(2)-(4)

(V)

(3)(2)-(5)

 (Cr)

(3)-(2)-(6)

(Mn)

(3)-(2)-(7)

(Fe)

(3)-(2)-(8)

(Co)

(3)-(2)-(9)

(Ni)

(3)-(3)-8

(Cu)

(3)-(3)-7

(Zn)

(3)-(3)-6

(Ga)

(3)-(3)-5

(Ge)

(3)-(3)-4

(As)

(3)-(3)-3

(Se)

(3)-(3)-2

(Br)

(3)-(3)-1

(Kr)

(3)-(3)-0

 (Na)

(2)-(2)-(1)

(Mg)

(2)-(2)-(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Al)

(2)-(2)-(3)

(Si)

(2)-(2)-(4)

(P)

(3)-(2)-3

(S)

(3)-(2)-2

(Cl)

(3)-(2)-1

(Ar)

(3)-(2)-0

(Li )

(2)-(1)-(1)

(Be)

(2)-(1)-(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(B)

(2)-(1)-(3)

(C)

(2)-(1)-(4)

(N)

(2)-(2)-3

(O)

(2)-(2)-2

(F)

(2)-(2)-1

(Ne)

(2)-(2)-0

(H)

(2)-(1)-1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(He)

(2)-(1)-0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

H

2-1-(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

He

2-1-0

Li

2-1-1

Be

2-1-2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

B

2-1-3

C

2-1-4

N

2-2-(3)

O

2-2-(2)

F

2-2-(1)

Ne

2-2-0

 Na

2-2-1

Mg

2-2-2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Al

2-2-3

Si

2-2-4

P

3-2-(3)

S

3-2-(2)

Cl

3-2-(1)

Ar

3-2-0

K

3-2-1

Ca

3-2-2

Sr

3-2-3

Ti

3-2-4

V

3-2-5

 Cr

3-2-6

Mn

3-2-7

Fe

3-2-8

Co

3-2-9

Ni

3-3-(8)

Cu

3-3-(7)

Zn

3-3-(6)

Ga

3-3-(5)

Ge

3-3-(4)

As

3-3-(3)

Se

3-3-(2)

Br

3-3-(1)

Kr

3-3-0

Rb

3-3-1

Sr

3-3-2

Y

3-3-3

Zr

3-3-4

Nb

3-3-5

Mo

3-3-6

Tc

3-3-7

Ru

3-3-8

Rh

3-3-9

Pd

4-3-(8)

Ag

4-3-(7)

Cd

4-3-(6)

In

4-3-(5)

Sn

4-3-(4)

Sb

4-3-(3)

Te

4-3-(2)

I

4-3-(1)

Xe

4-3-0

Cs

4-3-1

Ba

4-3-2

La

4-3-3

Hf

4-4-(14)

Ta

4-4-(13)

W

4-4-(12)

Re

4-4-(11)

Os

4-4-(10)

Ir

4-4-(9)

Pt

4-4-(8)

Au

4-4-(7)

Hg

4-4-(6)

Tl

4-4-(5)

Pb

4-4-(4)

Bi

4-4-(3)

Po

4-4-(2)

At

4-4(1)

Rn

4-4-0

Fr

4-4-1

Ra

4-4-2

Ac

4-4-3

Ku

5-4-(13)

Ha

5-4-(14)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

       

Ce

4-3-4

Pr

4-3-5

Nd

4-3-6

Pm

4-3-(7)

Sm

4-3-(8)

Eu

4-3-(9)

Gd

4-3-(10)

Tb

4-3-(11)

Dy

4-3-(12)

Ho

4-3-(13)

Er

4-3-(14)

Tm

4-3-(15)

Yb

4-3-(16)

Lu

4-4-(15)

       

Th

4-4-4

Pa

4-4-5

U

4-4-6

Np

4-4-7

Pu

4-4-8

Am

4-4-9

Cm

4-4-10

Bk

4-4-11

Cf

4-4-12

Es

4-4-13

Fm

4-4-14

Md

4-4-15

No

4-4-16

Lr

5-4-(15)

 

Categories: RS2 Research

Tabla de elementos quimicos materiales&cosmicos

RS2 Fora Comments - Sat, 04/12/2014 - 17:46

Tabla  de elementos quimicos materiales&cosmicos

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

       

(Th)

(4)-(4)-(4)

(Pa)

4-4-5

(U)

(4)-(4)-(6)

(Np)

(4)-(4)-(7)

(Pu)

(4)-(4)-(8)

(Am)

(4)-(4)-(9)

(Cm)

(4)-(4)-(10)

(Bk)

(4)-(4)-(11)

(Cf)

(4)-(4)-(12)

(Es)

(4)-(4)-(13)

(Fm)

(4)-(4)-(14)

(Md)

(4)-(4)-(15)

(No)

(4)-(4)-(16)

(Lr)

(5)-(4)-15

       

(Ce)

(4)-(3)-(4)

(Pr)

(4)-(3)-(5)

(Nd)

(4)-(3)-(6)

(Pm)

(4)-(3)-7

(Sm)

(4)-(3)-8

(Eu)

(4)-(3)-9

(Gd)

(4)-(3)-10

(Tb)

(4)-(3)-11

(Dy)

(4)-(3)-12

(Ho)

(4)-(3)-13

(Er)

(4)-(3)-14

(Tm)

(4)-(3)-15

(Yb)

(4)-(3)-16

(Lu)

(4)-(4)-15

(Fr)

(4)-(4)-(1)

(Ra)

(4)-(4)-(2)

(Ac)

(4)-(4)-(3)

(Ku)

(5)-(4)-13

(Ha)

(5)-(4)-14

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Cs)

(4)-(3)-(1)

(Ba)

(4)-(3)-(2)

(La)

(4)-(3)-(3)

(Hf)

(4)-(4)-14

(Ta)

(4)-(4)-13

(W)

(4)-(4)-12

(Re)

(4)-(4)-11

(Os)

(4)-(4)-10

(Ir)

(4)-(4)-9

(Pt)

(4)-(4)-8

(Au)

(4)-(4)-7

(Hg)

(4)-(4)-6

(Tl)

(4)-(4)-5

(Pb)

(4)-(4)-4

(Bi)

4-(4)-3

(Po)

(4)-(4)-2

(At)

(4)-(4)-1

(Rn)

(4)-(4)-0

(Rb)

(3)-(3)-(1)

(Sr)

(3)-(3)-(2)

(Y)

(3)-(3)-(3)

(Zr)

(3)-(3)-(4)

(Nb)

(3)-(3)-(5)

(Mo)

(3)-(3)-(6)

(Tc)

(3)-(3)-(7)

(Ru)

(3)-(3)-(8)

(Rh)

(3)-(3)-(9)

(Pd)

(4)-(3)-8

(Ag)

(4)-(3)-7

(Cd)

(4)-(3)-6

(In)

(4)-(3)-5

(Sn)

(4)-(3)-4

(Sb)

(4)-(3)-3

(Te)

(4)-(3)-2

(I)

(4)-(3)-1

(Xe)

(4)-(3)-0

(K)

(3)-(2)-(1)

(Ca)

(3)-(2)-(2)

(Sr)

(3)-(2)-(3)

(Ti)

(3)-(2)-(4)

(V)

(3)(2)-(5)

 (Cr)

(3)-(2)-(6)

(Mn)

(3)-(2)-(7)

(Fe)

(3)-(2)-(8)

(Co)

(3)-(2)-(9)

(Ni)

(3)-(3)-8

(Cu)

(3)-(3)-7

(Zn)

(3)-(3)-6

(Ga)

(3)-(3)-5

(Ge)

(3)-(3)-4

(As)

(3)-(3)-3

(Se)

(3)-(3)-2

(Br)

(3)-(3)-1

(Kr)

(3)-(3)-0

 (Na)

(2)-(2)-(1)

(Mg)

(2)-(2)-(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Al)

(2)-(2)-(3)

(Si)

(2)-(2)-(4)

(P)

(3)-(2)-3

(S)

(3)-(2)-2

(Cl)

(3)-(2)-1

(Ar)

(3)-(2)-0

(Li )

(2)-(1)-(1)

(Be)

(2)-(1)-(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(B)

(2)-(1)-(3)

(C)

(2)-(1)-(4)

(N)

(2)-(2)-3

(O)

(2)-(2)-2

(F)

(2)-(2)-1

(Ne)

(2)-(2)-0

(H)

(2)-(1)-1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(He)

(2)-(1)-0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

H

2-1-(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

He

2-1-0

Li

2-1-1

Be

2-1-2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

B

2-1-3

C

2-1-4

N

2-2-(3)

O

2-2-(2)

F

2-2-(1)

Ne

2-2-0

 Na

2-2-1

Mg

2-2-2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Al

2-2-3

Si

2-2-4

P

3-2-(3)

S

3-2-(2)

Cl

3-2-(1)

Ar

3-2-0

K

3-2-1

Ca

3-2-2

Sr

3-2-3

Ti

3-2-4

V

3-2-5

 Cr

3-2-6

Mn

3-2-7

Fe

3-2-8

Co

3-2-9

Ni

3-3-(8)

Cu

3-3-(7)

Zn

3-3-(6)

Ga

3-3-(5)

Ge

3-3-(4)

As

3-3-(3)

Se

3-3-(2)

Br

3-3-(1)

Kr

3-3-0

Rb

3-3-1

Sr

3-3-2

Y

3-3-3

Zr

3-3-4

Nb

3-3-5

Mo

3-3-6

Tc

3-3-7

Ru

3-3-8

Rh

3-3-9

Pd

4-3-(8)

Ag

4-3-(7)

Cd

4-3-(6)

In

4-3-(5)

Sn

4-3-(4)

Sb

4-3-(3)

Te

4-3-(2)

I

4-3-(1)

Xe

4-3-0

Cs

4-3-1

Ba

4-3-2

La

4-3-3

Hf

4-4-(14)

Ta

4-4-(13)

W

4-4-(12)

Re

4-4-(11)

Os

4-4-(10)

Ir

4-4-(9)

Pt

4-4-(8)

Au

4-4-(7)

Hg

4-4-(6)

Tl

4-4-(5)

Pb

4-4-(4)

Bi

4-4-(3)

Po

4-4-(2)

At

4-4(1)

Rn

4-4-0

Fr

4-4-1

Ra

4-4-2

Ac

4-4-3

Ku

5-4-(13)

Ha

5-4-(14)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

       

Ce

4-3-4

Pr

4-3-5

Nd

4-3-6

Pm

4-3-(7)

Sm

4-3-(8)

Eu

4-3-(9)

Gd

4-3-(10)

Tb

4-3-(11)

Dy

4-3-(12)

Ho

4-3-(13)

Er

4-3-(14)

Tm

4-3-(15)

Yb

4-3-(16)

Lu

4-4-(15)

       

Th

4-4-4

Pa

4-4-5

U

4-4-6

Np

4-4-7

Pu

4-4-8

Am

4-4-9

Cm

4-4-10

Bk

4-4-11

Cf

4-4-12

Es

4-4-13

Fm

4-4-14

Md

4-4-15

No

4-4-16

Lr

5-4-(15)

 

Categories: RS2 Research

Time Region: Bubble of Time or Window into the Cosmic Sector? (Problem)

RS2 Fora - Sat, 04/12/2014 - 12:19

I was working on my scalar motion model, updating it to include time and the cosmic sector and ran across another problem regarding the nature of "coordinate time" in the time region. Namely, is structure (3D coordinates) in the time region:

  1. Independent, like a microcosmic bubble of time, where all the temporal coordinates are just local to that micro-universe?
  2. Dependent upon locations and structures that exist within the 3D time of the cosmic sector, where unit space is a lens or window into the cosmic sector?

Larson tends to use the former (#1), treating the time region as sheet of graph paper to place rotations and orientations (the time region has geometry) to create atomic structure. He does allow other motions to enter and exit the time region. Spatial displacements (like the electron) just pass through as a conductor; temporal displacements get stuck and add to the existing motions like a chemical combination. But I have found no indication in Larson's works of any connection between the 3D time of the time region and the 3D time of the cosmic sector. (Rainer Huck indicated that Larson had to admit the existence of the cosmic sector, but did not like to think about it much, preferring to stay in the conventional reference system.)

While trying to design the structures for computer code, one cannot help but notice the similarities between the coordinate time of the time region and the coordinate time of the cosmic sector--they both work the same way. No sense in creating two copies of computer functions that do precisely the same thing, so I started factoring out the commonalities, which gave rise to this question.

When you DO factor out the pieces, you find a yin-yang interpretation of the two aspects of motion:

  • Yang: 1D, extension space or time
  • Yin: 2D, equivalent space or time

I am using 1D to represent space, because all spatial relationships are 1-dimensional--push or pull (similar to the Electric Universe theory), which can be assigned to an arbitrary 3D coordinate system. No matter how you move, dX, dY, dZ--it can still be reduced to a single, 1D vector. Equivalent space is 2D because you are dealing with planes instead of lines, more like an impeller creating a vortex.

For the conventional perspective of the material sector, we have "locations" in extension space (coordinates), where each location can contain outward motion in the time region (displacements manifest as photons, particles or atoms) that is expressed through equivalent space (rotationally inward motion in space). This results in spatial aggregates and physical structure. The cosmic sector is the inverse: extension time locations holding equivalent time structures--antimatter.

With this interpretation, what the program code comes down to is a choice: create an independent, micro-universe for each and every photon, particle and atom (which contains an infinite amount of time), or just place those temporal displacements at a unique, absolute location in the cosmic sector--one universe with distributed motion.

If the time region IS a "window" into the cosmic sector, then some interesting consequences arise:

  1. Spatial structure (the net displacements between atoms) may actually be the internal structure of a cosmic atom, since that window works both ways--the space region in the cosmic sector would be a window into the material sector. This may be the basis of Sacred Geometry, because by arranging things geometrically in space, you are actually altering atomic structure in time, resulting in nonlocal (energetic) consequences.
  2. Atoms would not be isolated from the rest of the universe and would be effected INTERNALLY by phenomena such as the microwave background radiation, neutrino background flux, gamma ray bursts and the like. The atomic structure would never be static; it would always be changing due to these influences. This may explain the intra-atomic energy (free energy) found by the 19th and early 20th century researchers like John W. Keely, Gustave LeBon, T. Henry Moray, Nikola Tesla and others. It would literally be "solar power" from INSIDE the atom.
  3. Material and cosmic atoms are not independent of each other, they are linked in a scalar fashion "each inside the other." That would indicate that the external spatial rotation (the C dimension, spinning the time region) would actually be the influence of the inverse structure, extension time, not an independent motion (unless there wasn't anything else around).

Though I have not found a way to represent this relation graphically, computer logic has no problem "abstracting" it into a useable structure that can be projected into the conventional reference systems. The only difference is the resulting behavior and consequences: a universe made up of micro-Universes at the atomic level is very mechanistic (like Larson preferred)--you don't have concepts like "free energy" or "Sacred Geometry" to worry about.

But, when you structure the Universe in a manner analogous to the situation Doctor Who (Jon Pertwee) encountered in "The Time Monster," landing his TARDIS inside the Master's TARDIS--to discover the Master's TARDIS also landed inside of his--you only need a single Universe with two aspects, existing as a scalar inversion... or should I say a "Reciprocal System."

I know the multiverse theory is quite popular--people love their parallel realities. But my tendency is towards #2, one universe with two aspects, each inside each other. As to why, well I've seen the effects of Sacred Geometry and Feng Shui on my own life and power coming out of "nowhere." This situation could readily explain those phenomenon, whereas the multiverse of mini-Universes could not, because all connection would be purely localized and mechanical.

I'd like to get some opinions, pro or con, before I delve further into the coding. Thanks.

Forums:
Categories: RS2 Research

Supernova cleans up its surroundings

Astronomy Magazine - Fri, 04/11/2014 - 19:00
Astronomers have identified a supernova remnant that has swept up a remarkable amount of material and has a different shape in radio data compared to that in X-rays.
Categories: Astronomy

Atomic Number Equation Based on Larson´s Triplets

RS2 Fora - Fri, 04/11/2014 - 17:31

 

 Tabla Elementos Quimicos

Tripletes de Larson

Atomic Number Equation Based on Larson’s Triplets
David Halprin
Where Z represents the Atomic Number, and (a, b, c) is the number triplet representing the atoms:


                                                                   Z+2=(a(a−1)(2a−1)+b(b+1)(2b+1)/3)+c                                                                                           (1)
If a = b then this reduces to
14 to 27

                                                                                   Z+2=(2b (2b2+1))/3+c                                                                                                      (2)
If a = b + 1 then it reduces to

 

a=b a=b a=b+1           a b a b Range of c Z Range of Z       2 1 -1 to 4 c + 2  1 to 6   2 2     -3 to 4 c + 10 7 to 14       3 2 -3 to 9 c + 18 15 to 27   3 3     -8 to 9 c + 36 28 to 45       4 3 -8 to 16 c + 54 46 to 70   4 4     -15 to 16 c + 86 71 to 102       5 4 -15 to -1 c + 118 103 to 117                  

 

Equation (1) is exactly representative of Dewey’s algorithm.
Equations (2) and (3) are just simplifications of Equation (1) when a = b and a = b + 1 respectively.
Some specific examples:
Larsonium (*)
5-4-(1) substituted into Equation (3) gives Z = 117 as expected, however there is an
interesting aside to consider, despite its counter-intuitive appearance and it requires some interpretation
within RS too.

---------------------------------------------------
* Not an “official” name for the element; also identified as Farnsium in Futurama episode, “Near-Death Wish.”
 

 

Copyright ©2002 by ISUS, Inc. All rights reserved.2 Atomic Number Equation Based on Larson’s Triplets

 

Atom/Particle Atomic Number Atomic Number Atom/Particle a-b-c Z   0-0-(1) -3 Electron 1-0-(1) -3 Rotational base 1-0-0 -2 Rotational base 0-0-0 -2 Rotational base 0-0-1 -1 Positron 1-0-1 -1 Neutrino  1-1-(1) -1 Neutron 1-1-0 0 Deuteron 1-1-0 0 Alpha Particle 1-1-0 0 Deuterium  1-1-1  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

H

2-1-(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

He

2-1-0

Li

2-1-1

Be

2-1-2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

B

2-1-3

C

2-1-4

N

2-2-(3)

O

2-2-(2)

F

2-2-(1)

Ne

2-2-0

 Na

2-2-1

Mg

2-2-2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Al

2-2-3

Si

2-2-4

P

3-2-(3)

S

3-2-(2)

Cl

3-2-(1)

Ar

3-2-0

K

3-2-1

Ca

3-2-2

Sr

3-2-3

Ti

3-2-4

V

3-2-5

 Cr

3-2-6

Mn

3-2-7

Fe

3-2-8

Co

3-2-9

Ni

3-3-(8)

Cu

3-3-(7)

Zn

3-3-(6)

Ga

3-3-(5)

Ge

3-3-(4)

As

3-3-(3)

Se

3-3-(2)

Br

3-3-(1)

Kr

3-3-0

Rb

3-3-1

Sr

3-3-2

Y

3-3-3

Zr

3-3-4

Nb

3-3-5

Mo

3-3-6

Tc

3-3-7

Ru

3-3-8

Rh

3-3-9

Pd

4-3-(8)

Ag

4-3-(7)

Cd

4-3-(6)

In

4-3-(5)

Sn

4-3-(4)

Sb

4-3-(3)

Te

4-3-(2)

I

4-3-(1)

Xe

4-3-0

Cs

4-3-1

Ba

4-3-2

La

4-3-3

Hf

4-4-(14)

Ta

4-4-(13)

W

4-4-(12)

Re

4-4-(11)

Os

4-4-(10)

Ir

4-4-(9)

Pt

4-4-(8)

Au

4-4-(7)

Hg

4-4-(6)

Tl

4-4-(5)

Pb

4-4-(4)

Bi

4-4-(3)

Po

4-4-(2)

At

4-4(1)

Rn

4-4-0

Fr

4-4-1

Ra

4-4-2

Ac

4-4-3

Ku

5-4-(13)

Ha

5-4-(14)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

       

Ce

4-3-4

Pr

4-3-5

Nd

4-3-6

Pm

4-3-(7)

Sm

4-3-(8)

Eu

4-3-(9)

Gd

4-3-(10)

Tb

4-3-(11)

Dy

4-3-(12)

Ho

4-3-(13)

Er

4-3-(14)

Tm

4-3-(15)

Yb

4-3-(16)

Lu

4-4-(15)

       

Th

4-4-4

Pa

4-4-5

U

4-4-6

Np

4-4-7

Pu

4-4-8

Am

4-4-9

Cm

4-4-10

Bk

4-4-11

Cf

4-4-12

Es

4-4-13

Fm

4-4-14

Md

4-4-15

No

4-4-16

Lr

5-4-(15)

 

Forums:
Categories: RS2 Research

Mindblwoing!

RS2 Fora Comments - Fri, 04/11/2014 - 16:36

How have I been missing this thread, this is collosal Bruce! Splendid!

Categories: RS2 Research

Kirchhoff's Law

RS2 Fora Comments - Fri, 04/11/2014 - 15:10

https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/2014/04/05/dr-pierre-marie-robitaille-o...

Dr. Pierre-Marie Robitaille: On the Validity of Kirchhoff’s Law

That's a very interesting video; I totally agree with Robitaille. I didn't know about the soot, but it makes sense as I've seen it used as a carbon source by many of the 19th century researchers.

Unless you've read the really old posts here, you may not realize that RS2 was actually created by Nehru nad myself over a discussion of the problems of blackbody radiation with the Reciprocal System, because it doesn't work in the RS with Larson's photon model. (Though Larson does ignore that fact, and just uses the t4 relationship in his calculations). Looks like we've come full circle.

Categories: RS2 Research

Single-atom gates open the door to quantum computing

Physics World - Fri, 04/11/2014 - 09:10
Independent teams unveil a basic building block of a quantum computer
Categories: Conventional Science

Faraway moon or faint star? Possible exomoon found

Astronomy Magazine - Fri, 04/11/2014 - 04:00
Although scientists say it’s impossible to confirm the world’s presence, the finding is a first step toward locating others.
Categories: Astronomy

Finding the “recipe for star formation”

Astronomy Magazine - Thu, 04/10/2014 - 18:30
Using a novel technique to reconstruct a cloud’s 3-D structure, astronomers can estimate how many new stars it is likely to form.
Categories: Astronomy

Acoustic metamaterial can be reconfigured in a jiffy

Physics World - Thu, 04/10/2014 - 08:49
Breakthrough could lead to ultrasonic superlenses
Categories: Conventional Science

Have galactic 'radio loops' been mistaken for B-mode polarization?

Physics World - Thu, 04/10/2014 - 05:08
Evidence for new foreground-to-BICEP2 measurements found
Categories: Conventional Science

Pages

Subscribe to The Reciprocal System of physical theory aggregator
latest_greatest_rs_research