Mars is the star of the show this week, but comet fans and a few gas giants will make welcome appearances in the night sky.

Categories: Astronomy

Researchers detected low levels of carbon monoxide gas around the star in amounts that are consistent with the comets in our own solar system.

Categories: Astronomy

Thanks to all who have tried but those 3 units describing time make no sense. What would you call them - time_sub_x time_sub_y and timesubz? What would any of these mean in relation to reality any sector or the Cosmic sector?

And none of the replies describing actually "moving" in 3d time. Seems it would have to be everywhere in space in the Cosmic sector leaves no where to move in it and that just makes no sense.

The more I think about it the more I see this Cosmic sector as indescribable and therefore untenable and just a way to fill holes. It has to mean something to OUR picture of reality and I think RS is just stretching what they call the "obvious".

Categories: RS2 Research

Huge meteorite impacts created a splash in northern Mars 3.4 billion years ago

Categories: Conventional Science

The team relied on gravitational lensing to see the incredibly faint object born just after the Big Bang.

Categories: Astronomy

You can follow along with the action here.

Categories: Astronomy

Each struck in different eras, leaving behind a breadcrumb trail of clues.

Categories: Astronomy

Has anyone thought much about Kozyrev's experiments? There is so much vague speculation out there about "torsion" that I think could be cleared up by reciprocal systems thinking. I was surprised to not find any previous discussions about it here.

Forums:
Categories: RS2 Research

A 'blanket' layer may keep the planet from a faint glow, unlike its neighbor, Neptune.

Categories: Astronomy

"Gyroid" photonic crystal could have a number of technological applications

Categories: Conventional Science

Whether the jovian moon has the raw materials and chemical energy in the right proportions to support biology is a topic of intense scientific interest.

Categories: Astronomy

The spacecraft has now twice observed 1994 JR1, a Kuiper Belt object orbiting more than 3 billion miles from the Sun.

Categories: Astronomy

Moving through the past, present, and future (time) rather than moving your physical position in XYZ (space).

The clock is 1-dimensional, where past, present and future are just the beginning, middle and end of one line. (Doesn't have to be a straight line.)

"Dimensions" is just a word we use to describe how many numbers it takes to describe an object. A line is 1-dimensional, because it only takes a single length to define it. Areas are 2D because it needs two numbers, a width and length. Volumes are 3D, because it is an area (2D) with a height, so 3 numbers needed.

Dimensions can have any units associated with them, space, meters, centons, seconds, time, etc. All "3D time" means is that it takes 3 numbers to define a structure, with "time" as units. We are used to 1D "clock time," with a starting point of zero, negative for the past and positive for the future. That is why "the arrow of time" is a line.

But what if "time" were a balloon, instead of an arrow? When you inflate the balloon, that "balloon of time" now needs 3 numbers to describe its size, width, depth and height--not just length, as in the arrow. That makes it 3-dimensional. Now you could look at the shadow of the balloon on the ground, and see only 2 dimensions for the same object--width and length, because the shadow is a projection (differentiation), so something got lost in the translation.

Clock time appears 1-dimensional because it is a projection of a net motion. In space, you only move 1-dimensionally, in that no matter where you start (x,y,z) and where you end (x,y,z), you only need 1 number, the distance you moved, to describe it. Clock time is works the same way--the 3 numbers of stuff moving in time leaves a 1-dimensional "trail" that we call a clock.

To understand 3D time, you have to stop looking at the trail, and see what was walking around, leaving the trail behind. Those are the "rotating systems."

Categories: RS2 Research

You move is space/time. But in cosmic sector you have time/space, also known as energy...

So in cosmic space you don't "move" but... "energize"?

Now you can club me...

OK, I'll send for Captain Caveman... you're close, but remember that time is a name that means "the reciprocal of space." So if you move (dx/t, dy/t, dz/t) in space, then you move as the reciprocal in time: (s/dx, s/dy, s/dz), where "s" is clock space.

But we always set the denominator to unity, as you always see "miles per hour", never stuff like "miles per 48 minutes." So rather than having 3 different values for "s", the ratio is inverted to (dx/s, dy/s, dz/s) and "s" can be uniformly set to 1. But then, our deltas have units of "time" and the ratio is t/s, that of energy, which cannot be expressed in linear space. So it is expressed in what Larson calls "equivalent space," a "yin" form of space that looks like the 19th century concept of aether--something invisible pushing stuff in space around, that we term as a force field.

Categories: RS2 Research

What would the code to detect such collisions in your simulation ?

After you calculate the expansion due to progression and the inward motion of the rotating systems involved, you check the distance between every pair of locations to see if it is zero. For example, if you have 2 locations that are 1 unit apart. Progression will double it to 2 units. If each rotating system at those locations has a net, inward motion of 1 unit, that is 2 units inward. 2 out + 2 in = 0 = concurrent.

Categories: RS2 Research

No one here has yet explained WHY there has to be a Cosmic sector where 3d time exists and space is NOT three dimensional. Is this just a conjecture or postulate that happens to fit? If so then can and likely is others.

Here's a crazy idea... try reading some of Larson's books, where he describes these things in detail. No point in regurgitating what is already written and published.

Categories: RS2 Research

expalin what it means to move in tiem in THREE DIMENSIONS!

Moving through the past, present, and future (time) rather than moving your physical position in XYZ (space).

Have you read all of Daniel's papers? If not, start with this link. He explains many of the general concepts, and how time/space relate to living a life on earth.

http://reciprocalsystem.org/papers/daniel-phoenix-iii

Categories: RS2 Research

I am a complete newbie to RS2theory, but I try a guess:

You don't move in cosmic sector.

You move is space/time. But in cosmic sector you have time/space, also known as energy...

So in cosmic space you don't "move" but... "energize"?

Now you can club me...

Categories: RS2 Research

everyone here agrees with everyone here but no has yet to expalin what it means to move in tiem in THREE DIMENSIONS!

No one here has yet explained WHY there has to be a Cosmic sector where 3d time exists and space is NOT three dimensional. Is this just a conjecture or postulate that happens to fit? If so then can and likely is others.

but thanks for trying!

Categories: RS2 Research