RS2 Fora

Subscribe to RS2 Fora feed
Updated: 1 hour 32 min ago

Does R/S theory allow for Parallel Universes?

Fri, 03/20/2015 - 09:36

Is there an additional you reading this article at this precise moment in a parallel universe? Dr. Brian Greene, writer ofThe Hidden Reality: Parallel Universes and the Deep Laws of theCosmos has faith that this freakish side of nature may exist; and he debates its amazing prospects in this 3-minute TV interview. A rising number of cosmologists agree with Greene that we are but one of many universes and nonetheless one of these other worlds lies close to ours, maybe only a Millimeter away. We cannot perceive this world, as it subsists in a type of space different from the four dimensions of our normal realism. MIT’s Max Tegmark trusts this multiverse model of ‘many universes’ is grounded in modern physics and will ultimately be testable, predictive and disprovable.  


“This is not sci-fi,” he says, “its real science.”     Forums:
Categories: RS2 Research

Teleportation and Time Travel

Wed, 03/18/2015 - 17:00

Lets assume  that Andrew Basiagio is a reliable witness and and that his statements are true, ie. that time travel and teleportation are real trechnologies that have been developed in the black budget world. If so, can Larson explain how this technology works? 

Categories: RS2 Research


Fri, 03/13/2015 - 23:03

Halton Arp has shown convincingly that  many quasars fan out along the minor axis of a host galaxy and that as they do their intrinsic red shift declines. I think this means that the ultra high speed matter of the quasar gradually slows down creating the illusion of higher mass and gravitation in the so called halo region of the host galaxy. Isnt it possible, even probable, that this is the source of the missing mass  which Shostak's research in the early 70's lead to the theory of dark matter?

Categories: RS2 Research

The equation of Motion

Fri, 03/13/2015 - 14:01

My theory maintains that all motion is logarithmic and spiral.

 The equation of the logarithmic spiral is:


r = e^aθ


Where r is is the radius, e is Euler's number, a is a constant and θ is the angle.


Note that eqaution of the form y=e^x is equal to its own derivative.  Its rate of change is not calculable.  You may ask what the radius r pertains to.  All motion must have and center that is unmoving.  This is the universal frame of reference and that center lies outside of space-time.


Since I live in South Florida I like to use the hurricane and the seashell as examples of the spiral motion.  Astronomers may look at the spiral galaxies.  Those who are constipated may relate to the spiral of the toilet flush. haha.


This eqaution remains the same under various geometric transformations such as inversion.  To graph r as 1/r merely produces the mirror image of the same spiral.  This is akin to viewing the Earth from the South pole instead of the North pole.

The evolute of of the logartihmic spiral produces the same spiral.  The cycloid also has this property.  A close look at the cycloid reveals that it traces out half of an ellipse at each cycle.  No one has ever noticed this before.  The ellipse is also a very identifiable natural motion of every orbit ever observed since Kepler.  The elliptical orbit is a spiral motion!


This finally solves the mystery of motion and explains why we cannot get a grip on it.  Mathematics is useless.  The calculus was good enough for approximation up until we wanted to penetrate the vastness of space, the macrocosmos.  It is a perpetual problem at the quantum level.  At these extremes all breaks down because motion is not calculable.  Computation has been able to get us into space but we cannot stay there too long.  Gravity always wins out in the end.  Our computers cannot compute to infinite digits.

Categories: RS2 Research

Proton-Electron Mass Ratio

Sat, 03/07/2015 - 10:03

Asimov states that one of the unaswered  questions in nuclear physics is the proton-electron mass ratio of 1,836. Does RT explain this ratio?

Categories: RS2 Research

The New Math

Thu, 03/05/2015 - 07:51

What is the background to the math?  Is it still the cartesian graph?  This graph depicts an absolute, unmoving space.  Any math using this as a reference frame is invalid.


After review of Miles Mathis papers I can only conclude that he is correc about two things.  First, that physics is a mess because it has been highjacked by math.  And the second is that the logarithmic function is falsely related to the calculus.  But he still uses an absolute space to calculate his revised calculus.


If space moves, our math is useless.  Space cannot be a reference frame and light speed cannot be used either because it is tied to space motion.  The only reference pointfor motion  is the focus of space, which is unmoving.

Categories: RS2 Research