RS2 Fora

Subscribe to RS2 Fora feed
Updated: 38 min 9 sec ago

Gravitational Waves

Wed, 02/10/2016 - 12:34

There has been a lot of "hush-hush" hubbub recently suggesting that astronomers have finally found "gravitational waves," as supposedly predicted by Relativity. I've noticed that Relativity tends to predict a lot of things after they've been discovered...

Larson, on the other hand, predicted a vibratory component to gravitation and published it his book, Basic Properties of Matter (1988) in Chapter 24, Isotopes, under the concept of a "gravitational charge." All charges are vibrations and vibrations form waves, so "gravitational waves."

In the Reciprocal System, atoms are not composed of protons and neutrons, but 2-dimensional, scalar rotation. Conventional atoms, the "material" ones, have that rotation in the time of the "time region," conventionally known as the "configuration space" of the atom. The speed of this rotation determines that atomic number, with an effective mass of twice the atomic number. Carbon, with an atomic number of 6 has a rotational mass of 12.

Mass can extend beyond the rotational mass by the accumulation of neutrinos in the time region, adding 1 amu to the effective mass, per neutrino. This addition is called "gravitational charge" by Larson, and accounts for isotopic mass, such as Carbon-14 (basic rotation of 12 + 2 captured neutrinos = 14).

Very heavy atoms, such as Uranium, have a substantial gravitational charge. Uranium has a mass of 236 but an atomic number of 92, accounting for only 184 amu, meaning that there are some 52 captured neutrinos adding a vibrational component to the gravitational effect.

If you examine the rumors of gravitational waves, they all center around supermassive objects, such as the theoretical "black hole." All these objects, on a stellar level, would have a substantial gravitational charge to them, so that is what is probably being picked detected.

Categories: RS2 Research

mass as approach speed of light

Tue, 02/09/2016 - 13:09

Please point me to articles or discussions about what happens to a particle as it approaches the speed of light. LHC and other colliders seem to confirm mass increases which RS says is not so and instead that "force" decreases? Are the measurements deceiving or invalid? Why?

Categories: RS2 Research

Crystal as a subtle receiver?

Mon, 02/08/2016 - 00:17
For several years, I've been looking around for an entry point to develop what would essentially be an information transducer for the mind, in the form of a receiver. Because I've had a soft assumption that any effective receiver would be probably biological/alive in some form, my investigations and experiments have primarily been focused around living systems as receivers.   Next up on my list though, is looking into using (natural) crystals, in this case quartz.  The idea came from a couple paragraphs from one of Drunvalo Melchizidek's books, here in edited form.   Natural crystals can only hold as many programs as there are faces on the end of the crystal. ...We placed a quartz crystal on a bench with the sensor of his molecular emission scanner (MES) aimed at the crystal to pick up the microwave emission and send them through the homemade software on the connected PC to be analyzed. Bob watched the screen as I programmed the crystal with my thoughts.  Our thoughts are long EM waves that transmit into space and can be received by sensitive equipment, so why not put them into a crystal to be received just like a radio signal? The instant I programmed the crystal with a thought (the idea of love), Bob noticed an immediate change in the sine-wave signature on the screen in the shorter wavelengths. It was not long before Bob could tell me instantly when I had programmed the crystal and when I had erased one of the programs. I would put three programs in and take out two, and Bob could see the three added blips on the sine-wave signature, then he would see two blips being removed   Before acquiring equipment,  I was curious to see if you have any thoughts on this from an RS2 perspective, as well as thoughts as an electrical engineer.  
  • Does the idea even sound plausible?
  • How would an aggregate such as a quartz crystal be able to store or maintain any variation or program such as described in it's structure?
  • I googled MES as I wasn't familiar with the instrument, and I wonder if a regular oscilloscope would work instead, and of what bandwidth, etc.
  • The author assumes that the method of transmission is long EM. I've been assuming that this effect would probably be non-local (based on other research), though I don't know how to evaluate this in RS2 thinking.


Categories: RS2 Research

Katirai on Photon frequency as a pressure

Fri, 01/15/2016 - 09:33

I've been going through Bahram Katirai's book, Revolution in Physics, where he revives ether theory ideas to explain many of the frauds perpetrated by Einstein (he includes about 100 pages on how Einstein stole his work from other researchers, particularly Henri Poincaré (the first guy to come up with E=mc2). I find the book very interesting, because if you substitute "time" for "ether," you end up with many of the concepts of the Reciprocal System, including an independent charge mechanism (Katirai's samareh) and that atoms are rotating systems. But since Katirai's premise is from the cosmic sector side of things, he fills in many of the gaps that Larson never addressed.

Katirai, like Larson, is also a "common sense" observer. Most people will discount what their senses tell them, if it conflicts with their beliefs. Larson and Katirai are the opposite. When they encounter something that doesn't make sense, they investigate it, rather than ignore it, to try to understand it and incorporate it into their world views.

One of the more interesting analogies he makes is his return to the "waves in ether" theory of light, comparing "pressure waves in air" (sound) to "pressure waves in ether" (light). In particular, the observation that it is the medium (air, water, ether) that determines the propagation speed of waves. When a train passes, the Doppler shift causes the approaching frequency to be higher (higher pressures in air, compressing waves), and the departing frequency lower (lower pressure spreads waves).

In Nehru's model, light is a birotation being carried by the progression. A change in frequency would require the addition or subtraction of units of motion (angular velocity) to each photon. The Doppler effect, however, seems to invalidate that frequency model because the effect is a property of the linear speed of the source and observer--not a property of the photon, itself.

So what I am wondering today is: what if frequency is a pressure differential, and not a property of the photon?

Categories: RS2 Research